MD SHAHNAWAZ ALIAS SHAHNAWAZ vs State of Bihar — 201/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),109(1),75,329(3),329(4),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Petition No. - Bail Petition

CNR: BRDA010018972026

Filing Number

1757/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

201/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Darbhanga

Judge

20-District and Addl. Sessions Judge III

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

2

Police Station

SAKATPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),109(1),75,329(3),329(4),352,351(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD SHAHNAWAZ ALIAS SHAHNAWAZ

    Adv. MANISH KUMAR MISHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The court granted regular bail to both petitioners, Md. Akhalak and Md. Shahnawaz, in an assault case arising from a property dispute. The court found that the injuries sustained were minor (scalp swelling and stitched wounds without intracranial contusion or bone injury), there was no evidence of repeated assault, and the petitioners had spent over a month in judicial custody, warranting bail on furnishing Rs. 15,000 bonds with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge III

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 201/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted regular bail to both petitioners, Md. Akhalak and Md. Shahnawaz, in an assault case arising from a property dispute. The court found that the injuries sustained were minor (scalp swelling and stitched wounds without intracranial contusion or bone injury), there was no evidence of repeated assault, and the petitioners had spent over a month in judicial custody, warranting bail on furnishing Rs. 15,000 bonds with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case