ADIL AKHTAR vs State of Bihar — 343/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,467,468. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRDA010018282026

Filing Number

1691/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

343/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Darbhanga

Judge

24-Spl. Judge SC/ST Atrocities

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

483

Police Station

LAHERIA SARAI

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,467,468

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ADIL AKHTAR

    Adv. SANJEEV RANJAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Summary The Exclusive Special Judge (SC/ST POA Act) in Darbhanga rejected the anticipatory bail application of Adil Akhtar (ABP No. 343/2026, dated 17-03-2026) in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 406, 420, 467, and 468. The court found sufficient evidence that the applicant conspired with co-accused to defraud a victim of ₹6,20,000 through false DPMSC tender schemes and fraudulent checks, making him an active member of an organized fraud gang, thereby denying him pre-arrest bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Atrocities

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Spl. Judge SC/ST Atrocities

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 343/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Exclusive Special Judge (SC/ST POA Act) in Darbhanga rejected the anticipatory bail application of Adil Akhtar (ABP No. 343/2026, dated 17-03-2026) in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 406, 420, 467, and 468. The court found sufficient evidence that the applicant conspired with co-accused to defraud a victim of ₹6,20,000 through false DPMSC tender schemes and fraudulent checks, making him an active member of an organized fraud gang, thereby denying him pre-arrest bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case