GANGA KUMAR JHA vs State of Bihar — 338/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRDA010018202026

Filing Number

1684/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

338/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Darbhanga

Judge

2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

192

Police Station

HAYAGHAT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GANGA KUMAR JHA

    Adv. Amit Kumar Jha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Gagan Kumar Jha in a kidnapping case (BNS Section 137(2)). The court found that phone call records linked the petitioner to the missing person, police investigation found the case true against him, and the victim remained unrecovered with investigation still in initial stages, warranting denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  6. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 338/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Gagan Kumar Jha in a kidnapping case (BNS Section 137(2)). The court found that phone call records linked the petitioner to the missing person, police investigation found the case true against him, and the victim remained unrecovered with investigation still in initial stages, warranting denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case