ANAND KUMAR ALIAS CHINTU vs State of Bihar — 193/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2)115(2),118(1),109,303(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 09th April 2026.
Bail Petition No. - Bail Petition
CNR: BRDA010018112026
Filing Number
1676/2026
Filing Date
21-Feb-2026
Registration No
193/2026
Registration Date
21-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Darbhanga
Judge
28-District and Addl. Sessions Judge VII
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
751
Police Station
LAHERIA SARAI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANAND KUMAR ALIAS CHINTU
Adv. RATAN KUMAR JHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The District and Additional Sessions Court in Darbhanga rejected the bail application of Anand Kumar in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352, and 3(5). The court found that the accused was involved in an assault on a salon owner on December 21, 2025, causing a lacerated wound to the head (a vital body part), and considered the seriousness of the offense and the accused's prior criminal history as grounds for denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge VII
-
04-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge VII
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 193/2026
Court Decision Summary The District and Additional Sessions Court in Darbhanga rejected the bail application of Anand Kumar in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352, and 3(5). The court found that the accused was involved in an assault on a salon owner on December 21, 2025, causing a lacerated wound to the head (a vital body part), and considered the seriousness of the offense and the accused's prior criminal history as grounds for denying bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts