MD MUSLIM vs State of Bihar — 320/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),190,126(2),115(2),329(4),117(2),118(1),109(1),76,303(2),352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRDA010017392026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1609/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
320/2026
Registration Date
19-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Darbhanga
Judge
2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
477
Police Station
BAHADURPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MD MUSLIM
Adv. NARESH KUMAR JHA
MD GUDDU ALIAS MS ASGAR ALI
MD CHUNCHUN ALIAS MD MUZBIL
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 20-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Md. Muslim, Md. Guddu, and Md. Chunchun) accused of assault and land grabbing in a land dispute case. The court found that medical evidence showed only simple injuries (no injury on one victim, one simple injury on another), contradicting the serious allegations, and noted that most charges were bailable. Each petitioner was granted bail on furnishing ₹10,000 bonds with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Md. Muslim, Md. Guddu, and Md. Chunchun) accused of assault and land grabbing in a land dispute case. The court found that medical evidence showed only simple injuries (no injury on one victim, one simple injury on another), contradicting the serious allegations, and noted that most charges were bailable. Each petitioner was granted bail on furnishing ₹10,000 bonds with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts