MD GUDDU vs State of Bihar — 316/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,126(2),127(1),109,324,351(2),35(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRDA010017302026

Filing Number

1600/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

316/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Darbhanga

Judge

2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

57

Police Station

ASHOK PAPER MILLS

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,126(2),127(1),109,324,351(2),35(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD GUDDU

    Adv. CHANDRA KANT YADAV

  2. 2.MD SHAMSHAD RIZVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga granted regular bail to the two petitioners (Md. Guddu and Md. Shamshad Rizvi) in a case involving charges of rioting and assault. The court found no specific overt act attributed to the petitioners, noted their clean antecedents, and applied the parity principle since similarly situated co-accused had already been granted bail. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to a condition against committing similar offences in future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 316/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga granted regular bail to the two petitioners (Md. Guddu and Md. Shamshad Rizvi) in a case involving charges of rioting and assault. The court found no specific overt act attributed to the petitioners, noted their clean antecedents, and applied the parity principle since similarly situated co-accused had already been granted bail. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to a condition against committing similar offences in future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case