MD GUDDU vs State of Bihar — 316/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,126(2),127(1),109,324,351(2),35(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 26th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRDA010017302026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1600/2026
Filing Date
19-02-2026
Registration No
316/2026
Registration Date
19-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Darbhanga
Judge
2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
57
Police Station
ASHOK PAPER MILLS
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MD GUDDU
Adv. CHANDRA KANT YADAV
MD SHAMSHAD RIZVI
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 20-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga granted regular bail to the two petitioners (Md. Guddu and Md. Shamshad Rizvi) in a case involving charges of rioting and assault. The court found no specific overt act attributed to the petitioners, noted their clean antecedents, and applied the parity principle since similarly situated co-accused had already been granted bail. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to a condition against committing similar offences in future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga granted regular bail to the two petitioners (Md. Guddu and Md. Shamshad Rizvi) in a case involving charges of rioting and assault. The court found no specific overt act attributed to the petitioners, noted their clean antecedents, and applied the parity principle since similarly situated co-accused had already been granted bail. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to a condition against committing similar offences in future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts