AJAY KUMAR MUKHIYA vs State of Bihar — 165/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.
Bail Petition No. - Bail Petition
CNR: BRDA010015052026
Filing Number
1393/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
165/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Darbhanga
Judge
28-District and Addl. Sessions Judge VII
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
13
Police Station
MANIGACHHI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AJAY KUMAR MUKHIYA
Adv. BINOD KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
SUMMARY: The District and Sessions Court in Darbhanga granted bail to accused Ajay Kumar Mukhiya in a case registered under Section 309(4) BNS (dacoity) at Munghaiti Police Station. The court found that the accused is not named in the FIR, no stolen property was recovered from him, no criminal history exists, and there is no medical evidence of injury to the complainant, warranting bail on a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties and the condition that he cooperate in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge VII
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge VII
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge VII
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge VII
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 165/2026
SUMMARY: The District and Sessions Court in Darbhanga granted bail to accused Ajay Kumar Mukhiya in a case registered under Section 309(4) BNS (dacoity) at Munghaiti Police Station. The court found that the accused is not named in the FIR, no stolen property was recovered from him, no criminal history exists, and there is no medical evidence of injury to the complainant, warranting bail on a bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties and the condition that he cooperate in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts