MO NURAHASAN vs State of Bihar — 243/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,115(2),351(2),352,303(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRDA010013952026

Filing Number

1288/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

243/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Darbhanga

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

174

Police Station

Mahila P.S.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,115(2),351(2),352,303(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MO NURAHASAN

    Adv. MANJU JHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge, Darbhanga, granted anticipatory bail to Md. Nurahasan in a dowry harassment case (Mahila P.S. Case No. 174/25). The court found the allegations of dowry demands, physical abuse, and attempted murder credible based on the FIR; however, it was inclined to grant bail considering the circumstances. The petitioner was ordered to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount and cooperate in the investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 243/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge, Darbhanga, granted anticipatory bail to Md. Nurahasan in a dowry harassment case (Mahila P.S. Case No. 174/25). The court found the allegations of dowry demands, physical abuse, and attempted murder credible based on the FIR; however, it was inclined to grant bail considering the circumstances. The petitioner was ordered to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount and cooperate in the investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case