JITU PASWAN vs State of Bihar — 156/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,342,323,324,326,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 09th March 2026.
Bail Petition No. - Bail Petition
CNR: BRDA010013852026
Filing Number
1279/2026
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
156/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Darbhanga
Judge
2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
176
Police Station
L.N.M. UNIVERSITY
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JITU PASWAN
Adv. MUKESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga, rejected Jitu Paswan's bail petition in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 302, 504, 506, and 34 arising from an alleged incident on 02.08.2014. The petitioner is accused of pouring kerosene oil on Anju Kumari and setting her ablaze, resulting in her death, following a dispute over a stolen mobile phone. The court found the direct accusation against the petitioner credible, supported by post-mortem evidence, and therefore declined to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
19-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 156/2026
Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga, rejected Jitu Paswan's bail petition in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 302, 504, 506, and 34 arising from an alleged incident on 02.08.2014. The petitioner is accused of pouring kerosene oil on Anju Kumari and setting her ablaze, resulting in her death, following a dispute over a stolen mobile phone. The court found the direct accusation against the petitioner credible, supported by post-mortem evidence, and therefore declined to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts