BABLOO KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 242/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,115(2),351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRDA010013792026

Filing Number

1275/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

242/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Darbhanga

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

126

Police Station

Mahila P.S.

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,115(2),351(2),3(5)
Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BABLOO KUMAR

    Adv. VISHWANATH KUMAR SAHNI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary: The Sessions Judge rejected Babloo Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a dowry harassment and domestic violence case. The court found prima facie evidence of his complicity in alleged dowry demands, physical/mental torture, and ousting of his wife from the matrimonial home, noting the husband bears sole responsibility for such acts. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the lower court, which shall consider his regular bail application without prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 242/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary: The Sessions Judge rejected Babloo Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a dowry harassment and domestic violence case. The court found prima facie evidence of his complicity in alleged dowry demands, physical/mental torture, and ousting of his wife from the matrimonial home, noting the husband bears sole responsibility for such acts. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the lower court, which shall consider his regular bail application without prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case