ANKIT KUMAR YADAV vs State of Bihar — 211/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRDA010011492026

Filing Number

1062/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

211/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Darbhanga

Judge

28-District and Addl. Sessions Judge VII

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

13

Police Station

MANIGACHHI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANKIT KUMAR YADAV

    Adv. Saroj Kumar Chaudhary

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ankit Kumar Yadav under Section 482 CrPC in a robbery case (Section 309(4) IPC). The court found that while the applicant has no prior criminal history, the case diary evidence indicates he was part of a loot gang involved in the incident, making him appear prima facie guilty; consequently, the court directed him to surrender and apply for regular bail before the lower court within 15 days, dismissing his anticipatory bail plea as unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge VII

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Restored

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge VII

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge VII

  6. 28-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge VII

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge VII

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge VII

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  10. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  11. 13-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  12. 05-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 211/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of Ankit Kumar Yadav under Section 482 CrPC in a robbery case (Section 309(4) IPC). The court found that while the applicant has no prior criminal history, the case diary evidence indicates he was part of a loot gang involved in the incident, making him appear prima facie guilty; consequently, the court directed him to surrender and apply for regular bail before the lower court within 15 days, dismissing his anticipatory bail plea as unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case