CHANDESHWAR YADAV vs State of Bihar — 104/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),96,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th March 2026.
Bail Petition No. - Bail Petition
CNR: BRDA010008382026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
782/2026
Filing Date
27-01-2026
Registration No
104/2026
Registration Date
27-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Darbhanga
Judge
2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
326
Police Station
KEOTI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHANDESHWAR YADAV
Adv. AMIT KUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 28-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 20-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 12-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga rejected the bail petition of 70-year-old Chandeshwar Yadav, accused of kidnapping a minor girl for marriage and religious conversion, primarily because the victim remains missing and unrecovered by police. The court discredited the petitioner's medical claims (finding his actual age ~55 years with only anal fissure, not serious cancer), holding that bail cannot be granted at this stage given the victim's continued disappearance, though he may renew his petition after the victim's recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga rejected the bail petition of 70-year-old Chandeshwar Yadav, accused of kidnapping a minor girl for marriage and religious conversion, primarily because the victim remains missing and unrecovered by police. The court discredited the petitioner's medical claims (finding his actual age ~55 years with only anal fissure, not serious cancer), holding that bail cannot be granted at this stage given the victim's continued disappearance, though he may renew his petition after the victim's recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts