CHANDESHWAR YADAV vs State of Bihar — 104/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),96,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th March 2026.
Bail Petition No. - Bail Petition
CNR: BRDA010008382026
Filing Number
782/2026
Filing Date
27-Jan-2026
Registration No
104/2026
Registration Date
27-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Darbhanga
Judge
2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
326
Police Station
KEOTI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHANDESHWAR YADAV
Adv. AMIT KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga rejected the bail petition of 70-year-old Chandeshwar Yadav, accused of kidnapping a minor girl for marriage and religious conversion, primarily because the victim remains missing and unrecovered by police. The court discredited the petitioner's medical claims (finding his actual age ~55 years with only anal fissure, not serious cancer), holding that bail cannot be granted at this stage given the victim's continued disappearance, though he may renew his petition after the victim's recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
28-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 104/2026
The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga rejected the bail petition of 70-year-old Chandeshwar Yadav, accused of kidnapping a minor girl for marriage and religious conversion, primarily because the victim remains missing and unrecovered by police. The court discredited the petitioner's medical claims (finding his actual age ~55 years with only anal fissure, not serious cancer), holding that bail cannot be granted at this stage given the victim's continued disappearance, though he may renew his petition after the victim's recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts