SANTOSH PASWAN vs State of Bihar — 65/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),308(3),109(1),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 09th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRDA010004262026
Filing Number
394/2026
Filing Date
13-Jan-2026
Registration No
65/2026
Registration Date
13-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Darbhanga
Judge
2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
208
Police Station
KAMTAUL
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANTOSH PASWAN
Adv. SRI RAMESH PASWAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Santosh Paswan, who was accused of instigating others to kidnap the informant at gunpoint in a case arising from a love affair involving the informant's daughter. The court found the allegations serious, noting prosecution witnesses supported the occurrence, cartridges were recovered, and investigation was ongoing, making it inappropriate to grant anticipatory bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
02-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
22-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I
-
15-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 65/2026
The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Santosh Paswan, who was accused of instigating others to kidnap the informant at gunpoint in a case arising from a love affair involving the informant's daughter. The court found the allegations serious, noting prosecution witnesses supported the occurrence, cartridges were recovered, and investigation was ongoing, making it inappropriate to grant anticipatory bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts