KAMAL RAM vs State of Bihar — 61/2026

Case under Essential Commodities Act Section 7. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRDA010003972026

Filing Number

367/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

61/2026

Registration Date

12-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Darbhanga

Judge

2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

116

Police Station

MORO

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Essential Commodities Act Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMAL RAM

    Adv. RASHID AHMAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge I, Darbhanga, rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Kamal Ram, a PDS shop operator, charged under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for allegedly misappropriating 43.76 quintals of wheat and 111.62 quintals of rice from his godown. The court found the allegations serious given the substantial shortage of essential foodgrains meant for public distribution, the petitioner's unsatisfactory explanation, and the grave impact on welfare schemes for economically weaker sections of society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  9. 13-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 61/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge I, Darbhanga, rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Kamal Ram, a PDS shop operator, charged under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for allegedly misappropriating 43.76 quintals of wheat and 111.62 quintals of rice from his godown. The court found the allegations serious given the substantial shortage of essential foodgrains meant for public distribution, the petitioner's unsatisfactory explanation, and the grave impact on welfare schemes for economically weaker sections of society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case