State of Bihar through Jamina Khatun vs MD Naushad — 21/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 308,323,324,341,379,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.

SESSION CASE

CNR: BRDA010002212026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

20-08-2024

Filing Number

205/2026

Filing Date

06-01-2026

Registration No

21/2026

Registration Date

06-01-2026

Court

DJ Div. Darbhanga

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

0401

Police Station

BAHADURPUR

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 308,323,324,341,379,34
Bihar Local Funds Audit Act,1930 Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

State of Bihar through Jamina Khatun

Respondent(s)

MD Naushad

MD Manjur

MD Asraph

MD Aslam

MD Dauad

Sawana Khatun

Najma Khatun

Khaitun Khatun

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

12-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.

09-03-2026

EVIDENCE

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

17-02-2026

EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Darbhanga acquitted all eight accused persons (Md. Naushad, Md. Manjur, Md. Asraf, Md. Aslam, Md. Daud, Sabana Khatoon, Nazma Khatoon, and Khaitoon Khatoon) of charges under IPC sections 341/34, 308/34, and 324/34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that key prosecution witnesses, including the informant herself, contradicted the allegations in cross-examination, admitting they had not directly witnessed the alleged assault and that injuries resulted from slipping in mud during a quarrel among children rather than from intentional assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Darbhanga acquitted all eight accused persons (Md. Naushad, Md. Manjur, Md. Asraf, Md. Aslam, Md. Daud, Sabana Khatoon, Nazma Khatoon, and Khaitoon Khatoon) of charges under IPC sections 341/34, 308/34, and 324/34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that key prosecution witnesses, including the informant herself, contradicted the allegations in cross-examination, admitting they had not directly witnessed the alleged assault and that injuries resulted from slipping in mud during a quarrel among children rather than from intentional assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DJ Div. Darbhanga All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case