State of Bihar through Jamina Khatun vs MD Naushad — 21/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 308,323,324,341,379,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
SESSION CASE
CNR: BRDA010002212026
e-Filing Number
20-08-2024
Filing Number
205/2026
Filing Date
06-01-2026
Registration No
21/2026
Registration Date
06-01-2026
Court
DJ Div. Darbhanga
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0401
Police Station
BAHADURPUR
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Bihar through Jamina Khatun
Respondent(s)
MD Naushad
MD Manjur
MD Asraph
MD Aslam
MD Dauad
Sawana Khatun
Najma Khatun
Khaitun Khatun
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C.
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | STATEMENT U/S.313 CR.P.C. | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Darbhanga acquitted all eight accused persons (Md. Naushad, Md. Manjur, Md. Asraf, Md. Aslam, Md. Daud, Sabana Khatoon, Nazma Khatoon, and Khaitoon Khatoon) of charges under IPC sections 341/34, 308/34, and 324/34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that key prosecution witnesses, including the informant herself, contradicted the allegations in cross-examination, admitting they had not directly witnessed the alleged assault and that injuries resulted from slipping in mud during a quarrel among children rather than from intentional assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Darbhanga acquitted all eight accused persons (Md. Naushad, Md. Manjur, Md. Asraf, Md. Aslam, Md. Daud, Sabana Khatoon, Nazma Khatoon, and Khaitoon Khatoon) of charges under IPC sections 341/34, 308/34, and 324/34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that key prosecution witnesses, including the informant herself, contradicted the allegations in cross-examination, admitting they had not directly witnessed the alleged assault and that injuries resulted from slipping in mud during a quarrel among children rather than from intentional assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts