Vishendra Singh vs State of Bihar Through Collector — 814/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26,. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th May 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRBU220008972023
Next Hearing
27th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
896/2023
Filing Date
07-12-2023
Registration No
814/2023
Registration Date
07-12-2023
Court
Dumraon Civil Division
Judge
5-Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-IV
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vishendra Singh
Adv. Rajesh Kumar Singh
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar Through Collector
Circle Officer
Mukhiya
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-IV
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 23-12-2025 | EVIDENCE | |
| 17-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: TPS No. 814/2023, Subordinate Court, Dumraon, Buxar District Date: 03.05.2024 Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's petition filed on 20.01.2024. The court rejected the plaintiff's application seeking to restrain construction work on the disputed property, finding no prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury in favor of the plaintiff. The disputed land, registered under the names of non-existent persons and now in government records for public welfare purposes (sanitation initiative), cannot be granted injunctive relief based on the plaintiff's unsubstantiated oral claims of ancestral possession dating back 85 years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: TPS No. 814/2023, Subordinate Court, Dumraon, Buxar District Date: 03.05.2024 Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's petition filed on 20.01.2024. The court rejected the plaintiff's application seeking to restrain construction work on the disputed property, finding no prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury in favor of the plaintiff. The disputed land, registered under the names of non-existent persons and now in government records for public welfare purposes (sanitation initiative), cannot be granted injunctive relief based on the plaintiff's unsubstantiated oral claims of ancestral possession dating back 85 years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts