Ajay Kumar Singh vs Nitendra Bahadur Singh — 532/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 06th August 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRBU220005752024
Filing Number
574/2024
Filing Date
29-Aug-2024
Registration No
532/2024
Registration Date
29-Aug-2024
Court
Dumraon Civil Division
Judge
4-Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
Last updated 11-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ajay Kumar Singh
Adv. Manish Kumar Sinha
-
2.Aditya Kumar Singh
-
3.Amit Kumar Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nitendra Bahadur Singh
-
2.Vibhay Kumar Singh
-
3.Pramod Kumar Singh
-
4.Raj Kumar Singh
-
5.Ranjit Bhadur Singh
-
6.Ravindra Bhadur Singh
-
7.Narendra Kumar Singh
-
8.Harendra Kumar Singh
-
9.Manoj Kumar Singh
-
10.Most Vina Devi
-
11.Most Nirmla Devi
-
12.Abhimanyu Kumar Singh
-
13.Satyamanyu Kumar Singh
Case History
-
06-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jul-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
18-Jun-2026
Copy of order
Case Summary: TS No. 532/2024 Court: Sub-judge (Third Class), Dumeraon, Buxar District Date: 18.06.2026 Petitioner: Ajay Kumar Singh, Aditya Kumar Singh, Amit Kumar Singh Respondent: Nitendra Bahadur Singh, Vibhay Kumar Singh, Pramod Kumar Singh Outcome: The petitioner's application under CPC Order 39 Rules 1-2 and Section 151 seeking to restrain respondents from construction work on disputed property was DISMISSED. The court found that the petitioner's father had already divided the property in 1981 through a deed, relinquishing claim to the disputed land (Account No. 1698, Plot No. 31/5059). The respondents have held possession, paid taxes, and obtained a decree in a prior suit (222/2012) based on the 1981 partition. The court determined no prima facie case or irreparable injury existed favoring the petitioner, and the relief sought lacked legal basis. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Order
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
04-Jun-2026
Order
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
21-May-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
07-May-2026
Order
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
30-Apr-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
22-Apr-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
16-Apr-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
19-Feb-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
12-Feb-2026
Copy of order
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
22-Jan-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
08-Jan-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
15-Dec-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
03-Dec-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
06-Nov-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
16-Oct-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
25-Sep-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
15-Sep-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
03-Sep-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
27-Aug-2025
Order
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
25-Aug-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
20-Aug-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
18-Aug-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
07-Aug-2025
Appearance
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
03-Jul-2025
Appearence
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
12-Jun-2025
Appearence
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
28-Apr-2025
Appearence
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
09-Apr-2025
Transfer
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
27-Mar-2025
Transfer
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
13-Feb-2025
Transfer
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I
-
08-Jan-2025
addmission
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I
-
27-Nov-2024
addmission
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I
-
17-Oct-2024
addmission
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I
-
18-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 532/2024
Case Summary: TS No. 532/2024 Court: Sub-judge (Third Class), Dumeraon, Buxar District Date: 18.06.2026 Petitioner: Ajay Kumar Singh, Aditya Kumar Singh, Amit Kumar Singh Respondent: Nitendra Bahadur Singh, Vibhay Kumar Singh, Pramod Kumar Singh Outcome: The petitioner's application under CPC Order 39 Rules 1-2 and Section 151 seeking to restrain respondents from construction work on disputed property was DISMISSED. The court found that the petitioner's father had already divided the property in 1981 through a deed, relinquishing claim to the disputed land (Account No. 1698, Plot No. 31/5059). The respondents have held possession, paid taxes, and obtained a decree in a prior suit (222/2012) based on the 1981 partition. The court determined no prima facie case or irreparable injury existed favoring the petitioner, and the relief sought lacked legal basis. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts