MD AAYUSH vs HARERAM YADAV — 5/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Contested--DECREE on 03rd July 2026.

Case disposed

MONEY SUIT

CNR: BRBU220004932017

Filing Number

5/2017

Filing Date

31-May-2014

Registration No

5/2017

Registration Date

31-May-2017

Court

Dumraon Civil Division

Judge

4-Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

Decision Date

03-Jul-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREE

Last updated 11-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD AAYUSH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARERAM YADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jul-2026

    Copy of Judgment

    Case Summary: MD AAYUSH v. HARERAM YADAV (Case 5/2017) The court ruled in favor of the petitioner (MD Aayush), holding that the respondent (Hareram Yadav) must repay ₹4,80,000 (four lakh eighty thousand) with 6% annual interest from July 14, 2014 until payment. The court found that the petitioner had transferred this amount to the respondent's bank account as financial assistance, and the respondent failed to return it despite legal notices. The court rejected the respondent's defense that no loan existed, finding the petitioner's documentary and oral evidence more credible and establishing that the respondent was obligated to repay the money. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Jul-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  4. 17-Jun-2026

    Judgement

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  5. 20-May-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  6. 06-May-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  7. 15-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  8. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  9. 21-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  10. 09-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  11. 28-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  12. 24-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  13. 29-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  14. 03-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  15. 20-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  16. 11-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  17. 07-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  18. 18-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  19. 04-Jun-2025

    Judgement

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  20. 07-May-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  21. 16-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  22. 19-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  23. 05-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  24. 03-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  25. 19-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  26. 05-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  27. 15-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  28. 04-Dec-2024

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  29. 23-Oct-2024

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  30. 03-Sep-2024

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  31. 27-Aug-2024

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  32. 06-Aug-2024

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  33. 19-Jun-2024

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  34. 20-May-2024

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  35. 02-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  36. 14-Mar-2024

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  37. 15-Feb-2024

    Arguments

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  38. 24-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  39. 20-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  40. 22-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  41. 01-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  42. 04-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  43. 16-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  44. 19-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  45. 21-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  46. 17-May-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  47. 12-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  48. 22-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  49. 22-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  50. 11-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  51. 09-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  52. 05-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  53. 07-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  54. 14-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  55. 20-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  56. 26-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  57. 26-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  58. 07-Jul-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  59. 27-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III

  60. 17-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  61. 09-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  62. 20-May-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  63. 26-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  64. 22-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  65. 22-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  66. 18-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  67. 16-Nov-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  68. 10-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  69. 26-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  70. 28-Jun-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  71. 27-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  72. 01-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  73. 23-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  74. 28-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  75. 18-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  76. 08-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  77. 13-Nov-2020

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  78. 19-Oct-2020

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  79. 09-Oct-2020

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  80. 05-Oct-2020

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  81. 14-Sep-2020

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  82. 13-Aug-2020

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  83. 07-Jul-2020

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  84. 16-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  85. 24-Apr-2020

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  86. 25-Mar-2020

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  87. 26-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  88. 18-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  89. 08-Jan-2020

    Evidence

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  90. 18-Oct-2019

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  91. 19-Aug-2019

    Institution Of Case

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  92. 25-Jul-2019

    Institution Of Case

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  93. 18-Jun-2019

    Institution Of Case

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  94. 16-Jun-2019

    Institution Of Case

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  95. 16-May-2019

    Institution Of Case

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  96. 24-Jan-2019

    Institution Of Case

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  97. 22-Nov-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  98. 31-May-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MD AAYUSH v. HARERAM YADAV (Case 5/2017) The court ruled in favor of the petitioner (MD Aayush), holding that the respondent (Hareram Yadav) must repay ₹4,80,000 (four lakh eighty thousand) with 6% annual interest from July 14, 2014 until payment. The court found that the petitioner had transferred this amount to the respondent's bank account as financial assistance, and the respondent failed to return it despite legal notices. The court rejected the respondent's defense that no loan existed, finding the petitioner's documentary and oral evidence more credible and establishing that the respondent was obligated to repay the money. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case