LAL BABU SINGH vs BIHARI SINGH — 325/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Title Suit

CNR: BRBU220004182019

Filing Number

325/2019

Filing Date

30-Sep-2019

Registration No

325/2019

Registration Date

30-Sep-2019

Court

Dumraon Civil Division

Judge

1-Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAL BABU SINGH

    Adv. Arvind Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIHARI SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The Civil Judge dismissed the case (Suit No. 325/2019) for default due to the plaintiff's consistent non-appearance and failure to comply with the court's order dated 09-08-2024, despite multiple opportunities granted. The court found that since the case had been pending since 2019 without proper prosecution, further adjournment was not justified, warranting dismissal under default proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  4. 06-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  5. 14-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  6. 26-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  7. 17-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  8. 15-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  9. 07-Feb-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  10. 29-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  11. 13-Sep-2024

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  12. 30-Aug-2024

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  13. 09-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  14. 07-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  15. 22-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  16. 09-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  17. 22-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  18. 28-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  19. 05-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  20. 27-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  21. 02-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  22. 20-Oct-2022

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  23. 17-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  24. 25-May-2022

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  25. 11-Mar-2022

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  26. 04-Mar-2022

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  27. 24-Feb-2022

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  28. 18-Feb-2022

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  29. 07-Feb-2022

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  30. 27-Jan-2022

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  31. 17-Nov-2021

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  32. 05-Aug-2021

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  33. 21-May-2021

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  34. 23-Mar-2021

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  35. 29-Jan-2021

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  36. 03-Dec-2020

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  37. 24-Sep-2020

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  38. 09-Jul-2020

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  39. 04-May-2020

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  40. 18-Feb-2020

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  41. 05-Feb-2020

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  42. 19-Dec-2019

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-II

  43. 16-Oct-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 30-Sep-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 325/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The Civil Judge dismissed the case (Suit No. 325/2019) for default due to the plaintiff's consistent non-appearance and failure to comply with the court's order dated 09-08-2024, despite multiple opportunities granted. The court found that since the case had been pending since 2019 without proper prosecution, further adjournment was not justified, warranting dismissal under default proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case