Vikrma Pandey vs Raj Kumar Sah — 322/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

Appearance Next hearing 05-May-2026

Title Suit

CNR: BRBU220003242015

Filing Number

322/2015

Filing Date

19-Nov-2015

Registration No

322/2015

Registration Date

19-Nov-2015

Court

Dumraon Civil Division

Judge

1-Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vikrma Pandey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Raj Kumar Sah

  2. 2.Shivkumar Sah(Legal Heir)(Dead)

  3. 3.Ajay Kumar

  4. 4.Banvari Pandey(Legal Heir)

  5. 5.Damodar Pandey

  6. 6.Madho Pandey

  7. 7.Vrij Bihari Pandey

  8. 8.Gangajali Kunwar

  9. 9.Manoj Pandey

  10. 10.Kamla Pandey

  11. 11.Lakshman Pandey

  12. 12.Rameshwar Pandey

  13. 13.Binod Pandey

  14. 14.Dinesh Prasad

  15. 15.Mahendra Sah

  16. 16.Mina Kunwar

  17. 17.Rajesh Kumar Pandey

  18. 18.Shiv Parshan Singh

  19. 19.Rajendra singh

  20. 20.Kameshwar Singh

  21. 21.Lalan Singh

  22. 22.Vigan Singh

  23. 23.Ram Sagar Singh

  24. 24.Arun Kumar Tiwari

Case History

  1. 05-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  6. 27-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  7. 02-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  8. 11-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  9. 16-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  10. 28-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  11. 29-Jul-2025

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Summary: The petition filed by Vikram Pandey (plaintiff) under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC on 03-06-2025 seeking amendment of the plaint due to typographical errors has been allowed. The court directed the plaintiff's counsel to amend the plaint before the office, noting that the amendment is merely formal and does not alter the nature of the case. The defendant's counsel did not object. The case is adjourned to 28-08-2025 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 29-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  13. 08-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  14. 03-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  15. 14-May-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  16. 03-Mar-2025

    Copy of orderView PDF

  17. 03-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  18. 23-Dec-2024

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  19. 21-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  20. 21-Aug-2024

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  21. 12-Jun-2024

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  22. 18-Apr-2024

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  23. 14-Mar-2024

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  24. 21-Dec-2023

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  25. 11-Oct-2023

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  26. 02-Aug-2023

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  27. 29-May-2023

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  28. 22-Mar-2023

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  29. 22-Mar-2016

    Appearance

  30. 21-Jan-2016

    Appearance

  31. 18-Dec-2015

    Appearance

  32. 15-Dec-2015

    addmission

  33. 05-Dec-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 19-Nov-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 322/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by Vikram Pandey (plaintiff) under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC on 03-06-2025 seeking amendment of the plaint due to typographical errors has been allowed. The court directed the plaintiff's counsel to amend the plaint before the office, noting that the amendment is merely formal and does not alter the nature of the case. The defendant's counsel did not object. The case is adjourned to 28-08-2025 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case