DUNDHLI SHARMA vs RAM PRAVESH BIND Advocate - Pramod Kumar Rai — 76/2013

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 05-May-2026

Title Suit

CNR: BRBU220001662013

Filing Number

76/2013

Filing Date

01-Oct-2013

Registration No

76/2013

Registration Date

01-Oct-2013

Court

Dumraon Civil Division

Judge

3-Civil Judge (Jr Div)

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DUNDHLI SHARMA

    Adv. Kumar Awadh Bihari Pathak

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAM PRAVESH BIND Advocate - Pramod Kumar Rai

Case History

  1. 05-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr Div)

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr Div)

  4. 28-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr Div)

  5. 18-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr Div)

  6. 17-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr Div)

  7. 06-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr Div)

  8. 26-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr Div)

  9. 13-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr Div)

  10. 28-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr Div)

  11. 16-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr Div)

  12. 12-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr Div)

  13. 09-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge (Jr Div)

  14. 04-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Munsif

  15. 13-May-2024

    Hearing

    Munsif

  16. 04-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Munsif

  17. 21-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Munsif

  18. 13-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    Munsif

  19. 18-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    Munsif

  20. 11-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    Munsif

  21. 08-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Munsif

  22. 02-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Munsif

  23. 19-May-2023

    Hearing

    Munsif

  24. 25-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    Munsif

  25. 06-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    Munsif

  26. 09-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    Munsif

  27. 17-Dec-2022

    Hearing

    Munsif

  28. 17-Nov-2022

    Hearing

    Munsif

  29. 10-Oct-2022

    Hearing

    Munsif

  30. 22-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    Munsif

  31. 23-Aug-2022

    Copy of orderView PDF

    SUMMARY: The court rejected the defendant's objection petition filed on 10.08.2022 and allowed the plaintiff's application under CPC Section 151, Rules 1 & 2. The court ordered that no construction work shall be carried out on the disputed property and the status quo shall be maintained, while directing both parties not to undertake any construction activities on the contested land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  32. 23-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    Munsif

  33. 17-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    Munsif

  34. 10-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    Munsif

  35. 28-Jul-2022

    Hearing

    Munsif

  36. 03-Jun-2022

    Hearing

    Munsif

  37. 20-May-2022

    Hearing

    Munsif

  38. 15-Mar-2022

    Hearing

    Munsif

  39. 11-Jan-2022

    Hearing

    Munsif

  40. 29-Oct-2021

    Hearing

    Munsif

  41. 05-Oct-2021

    Hearing

    Munsif

  42. 05-Aug-2021

    Hearing

    Munsif

  43. 09-Jun-2021

    Hearing

    Munsif

  44. 06-Apr-2021

    Hearing

    Munsif

  45. 29-Jan-2021

    Hearing

    Munsif

  46. 10-Nov-2020

    Hearing

    Munsif

  47. 18-Aug-2020

    Hearing

    Munsif

  48. 27-May-2020

    Hearing

    Munsif

  49. 28-Feb-2020

    Hearing

    Munsif

  50. 08-Jan-2020

    Hearing

    Munsif

  51. 07-Nov-2019

    Hearing

    Munsif

  52. 24-Oct-2019

    Hearing

    Munsif

  53. 29-Aug-2019

    Hearing

    Munsif

  54. 22-Jul-2019

    Hearing

    Munsif

  55. 18-Jul-2019

    Hearing

    Munsif

  56. 01-Nov-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  57. 01-Oct-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. 76/2013

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The court rejected the defendant's objection petition filed on 10.08.2022 and allowed the plaintiff's application under CPC Section 151, Rules 1 & 2. The court ordered that no construction work shall be carried out on the disputed property and the status quo shall be maintained, while directing both parties not to undertake any construction activities on the contested land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case