Jagnarayan Choudhari vs Chunmun Choudhari — 151/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Evide. of Plaintif/Petisnor. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRBU220001542024
Filing Number
154/2024
Filing Date
27-Feb-2024
Registration No
151/2024
Registration Date
27-Feb-2024
Court
Dumraon Civil Division
Judge
5-Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-IV
Last updated 11-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jagnarayan Choudhari
Adv. Vikash Anand
-
2.Gorakh Choudhari
-
3.Ram Pravesh Choudhari
-
4.Ramnaresh Choudhari
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chunmun Choudhari
-
2.Munmun Choudhari
-
3.Satya Narayan Choudhari
-
4.Parasnath Choudhari
-
5.Chhotan Choudhari
-
6.Samir Choudhari
-
7.Rajendra Choudhari
-
8.Ramjag Choudhari
-
9.Virendra Choudhari
-
10.Rambachan Choudhari
-
11.Ramvrit Choudhari
-
12.Hridya Choudhari
-
13.Rajesh Choudhari
-
14.Ramrup Choudhari
-
15.Urmila Devi
Case History
-
20-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jun-2026
Evide. of Plaintif/Petisnor
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-IV
-
10-Jun-2026
Evide. of Plaintif/Petisnor
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-IV
-
18-May-2026
Evide. of Plaintif/Petisnor
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-IV
-
06-May-2026
Evide. of Plaintif/Petisnor
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-IV
-
29-Apr-2026
Evide. of Plaintif/Petisnor
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-IV
-
20-Apr-2026
Evide. of Plaintif/Petisnor
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-IV
-
15-Apr-2026
Evide. of Plaintif/Petisnor
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-IV
-
08-Apr-2026
Evide. of Plaintif/Petisnor
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-IV
-
01-Apr-2026
Evide. of Plaintif/Petisnor
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-IV
-
25-Mar-2026
Evide. of Plaintif/Petisnor
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
18-Mar-2026
Evide. of Plaintif/Petisnor
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
26-Feb-2026
Evide. of Plaintif/Petisnor
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
11-Feb-2026
Evide. of Plaintif/Petisnor
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
10-Dec-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
27-Aug-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
31-Jul-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
25-Jun-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
07-May-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
02-Apr-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
19-Feb-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
29-Jan-2025
Hearing
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
06-Jan-2025
Copy of order
Summary of Case 151/2024 Outcome: The petitioner's application seeking temporary injunction against construction on disputed land was dismissed. The court found that the balance of convenience favored the respondents, as they had prior possession of the disputed property and a decree in their favor from an earlier 1979 suit (TS 193/1979). The petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims of ownership rights over the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Jan-2025
Order
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
11-Dec-2024
Order
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
13-Nov-2024
Appearence
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
09-Oct-2024
Appearence
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
27-Sep-2024
Appearence
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
21-Sep-2024
Appearence
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
03-Sep-2024
Appearence
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
06-Aug-2024
Appearence
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
11-Jul-2024
Appearence
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
31-May-2024
Appearence
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
30-Apr-2024
Transfer
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-III
-
22-Mar-2024
Transfer
Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I
-
20-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 151/2024
Summary of Case 151/2024 Outcome: The petitioner's application seeking temporary injunction against construction on disputed land was dismissed. The court found that the balance of convenience favored the respondents, as they had prior possession of the disputed property and a decree in their favor from an earlier 1979 suit (TS 193/1979). The petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims of ownership rights over the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts