Vinod Kumar Singh vs Dayashankar Singh — 107/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Appearance Next hearing 15-Jul-2026 this date has passed

Title Suit

CNR: BRBU220001262026

Filing Number

126/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

107/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

Dumraon Civil Division

Judge

1-Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

Last updated 11-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vinod Kumar Singh

    Adv. Dev Krishna Choubey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dayashankar Singh

  2. 2.Most Pushpa Singh

  3. 3.Divy Kumar Singh

  4. 4.Ishan Maruti Singh

  5. 5.Most Rekha Singh

  6. 6.Ritvik Singh

  7. 7.Vishal Kumar Singh

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  4. 21-May-2026

    Copy of order

    Case Summary: 107/2026 The court allowed petitioner Vinod Kumar Singh's application under Order 1 Rule 10 and Order 6 Rule 17 to add Vishal Kumar Singh (son of respondent Dayashankar Singh) as a party-respondent to the suit. The court found that Vishal Kumar Singh executed an unauthorized deed on 18.04.2026 affecting the disputed property, necessitating his inclusion. The case is adjourned to 11.06.2026 for remaining hearings and further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 21-May-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  6. 22-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 107/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 107/2026 The court allowed petitioner Vinod Kumar Singh's application under Order 1 Rule 10 and Order 6 Rule 17 to add Vishal Kumar Singh (son of respondent Dayashankar Singh) as a party-respondent to the suit. The court found that Vishal Kumar Singh executed an unauthorized deed on 18.04.2026 affecting the disputed property, necessitating his inclusion. The case is adjourned to 11.06.2026 for remaining hearings and further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case