kabutari Devi and others vs State of Bihar Others — 37/2005
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRBU220000732005
Filing Number
37/2005
Filing Date
25-May-2005
Registration No
37/2005
Registration Date
25-May-2005
Court
Dumraon Civil Division
Judge
3-Civil Judge (Jr Div)
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.kabutari Devi and others
Adv. Gopal Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Others
Case History
-
18-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Apr-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
02-Apr-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
23-Dec-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
04-Dec-2025
Copy of orderView PDF
Summary The petition to reopen evidence was allowed. The court found that the plaintiff's counsel had bona fide overlooked a document during proceedings and should not be punished for this mistake. The State of Bihar was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 250/- to be deposited in Nazarat. The plaintiff's evidence is reopened solely for adducing the specified evidence, with the case listed on 23-12-2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
12-Sep-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
05-Aug-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
20-Jun-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
05-Jun-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
16-May-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
01-May-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
16-Apr-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
18-Feb-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
11-Feb-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
31-Jan-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
25-Jan-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
29-Nov-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
25-Nov-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
30-Oct-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
01-Oct-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
03-Sep-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
27-Aug-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
09-Aug-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge (Jr Div)
-
28-Jun-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
20-May-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
25-Apr-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
13-Mar-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
15-Feb-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
29-Jan-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
02-Jan-2024
Evidence
Munsif
-
05-Dec-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
03-Nov-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
06-Oct-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
20-Sep-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
16-Aug-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
12-Jun-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
09-Jun-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
19-May-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
02-May-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
10-Apr-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
29-Mar-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
10-Mar-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
03-Feb-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
16-Jan-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
05-Jan-2023
Evidence
Munsif
-
16-Dec-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
28-Nov-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
11-Nov-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
11-Oct-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
28-Sep-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
29-Aug-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
23-Aug-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
01-Aug-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
14-Jul-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
27-Jun-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
27-Apr-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
22-Feb-2022
Evidence
Munsif
-
17-Dec-2021
Evidence
Munsif
-
26-Oct-2021
Evidence
Munsif
-
13-Aug-2021
Evidence
Munsif
-
19-Jul-2021
Evidence
Munsif
-
21-May-2021
Evidence
Munsif
-
17-Mar-2021
Evidence
Munsif
-
13-Jan-2021
Evidence
Munsif
-
15-Oct-2020
Evidence
Munsif
-
30-Jul-2020
Evidence
Munsif
-
04-May-2020
Evidence
Munsif
-
03-Mar-2020
Evidence
Munsif
-
17-Jan-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-May-2005
Case filed
Registration No. 37/2005
Summary The petition to reopen evidence was allowed. The court found that the plaintiff's counsel had bona fide overlooked a document during proceedings and should not be punished for this mistake. The State of Bihar was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 250/- to be deposited in Nazarat. The plaintiff's evidence is reopened solely for adducing the specified evidence, with the case listed on 23-12-2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts