Amar Nath Mishra vs Mahesh Dubey — 8/2023
Case under Guardian Wards Act Section 7 (i) b, 10. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
GUARDIANSHIP
CNR: BRBU100100682023
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
849/2023
Filing Date
18-12-2023
Registration No
8/2023
Registration Date
18-12-2023
Court
DJ Div. Buxar
Judge
2-Principal Judge, Family Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Amar Nath Mishra
Adv. Laxman Jee Rai
Respondent(s)
Mahesh Dubey
Sonawati Devi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Principal Judge, Family Court
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 13-04-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 19-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 10-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the respondent's preliminary objection to jurisdiction filed under CPC Rule 11, Order 7, finding that the court has territorial jurisdiction over the guardianship case. The petitioner (father Amarnath Mishra) filed the guardianship petition for four minor children in 2023; while three children were born in Dhanbad and one in Baksar district, all are being maintained in Dhanbad where the respondent resides. The court held that since evidence has already commenced and the case is substantively proceeding, the jurisdiction question should be decided on merits rather than through a preliminary objection, and ordered the case to continue with cross-examination of witness scheduled for March 10, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the respondent's preliminary objection to jurisdiction filed under CPC Rule 11, Order 7, finding that the court has territorial jurisdiction over the guardianship case. The petitioner (father Amarnath Mishra) filed the guardianship petition for four minor children in 2023; while three children were born in Dhanbad and one in Baksar district, all are being maintained in Dhanbad where the respondent resides. The court held that since evidence has already commenced and the case is substantively proceeding, the jurisdiction question should be decided on merits rather than through a preliminary objection, and ordered the case to continue with cross-examination of witness scheduled for March 10, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts