Parveen kumar Rai vs State of Bihar — 1431/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBU100090712025

e-Filing Number

18-12-2025

Filing Number

7998/2025

Filing Date

18-Dec-2025

Registration No

1431/2025

Registration Date

18-Dec-2025

Court

DJ Div. Buxar

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A
Prevention of Dowry Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Parveen kumar Rai

    Adv. Jai Prakash Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The Sessions Court, Buxar rejected Praveen Kumar Rai's anticipatory bail petition in a dowry harassment case under IPC Section 498(A) and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found the charges serious and noted that cognizance had already been taken, directing the petitioner to surrender before the trial court and seek regular bail, which would be decided without prejudice by the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  8. 06-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  9. 23-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  10. 20-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  11. 19-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 18-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1431/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court, Buxar rejected Praveen Kumar Rai's anticipatory bail petition in a dowry harassment case under IPC Section 498(A) and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found the charges serious and noted that cognizance had already been taken, directing the petitioner to surrender before the trial court and seek regular bail, which would be decided without prejudice by the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case