kamlesh Kumar Ram vs State of Bihar — 138/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,307,337,379,354,504,506/34. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 30th May 2026.
Cri. Rev App. - CRI. REVISION
CNR: BRBU100089272025
e-Filing Number
10-12-2025
Filing Number
7872/2025
Filing Date
10-Dec-2025
Registration No
138/2025
Registration Date
10-Dec-2025
Court
DJ Div. Buxar
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
30-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 11-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
301
Police Station
BRAHMPUR
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.kamlesh Kumar Ram
Adv. Vishal Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
-
2.Anil Kumar Ram
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-May-2026
Copy of order
CASE SUMMARY The Sessions Judge dismissed Kamlesh Kumar Ram's revision petition challenging the magistrate's cognizance order in a group assault case arising from a partition dispute. Although the investigating officer's chargesheet excluded the petitioner and charged only four others under IPC sections 341, 323, 337, 504, 506/34, the magistrate took cognizance against all FIR-named accused including the petitioner under additional sections 307, 379, 354. The court held the magistrate's reasoned order lawful, finding the lower court properly exercised jurisdiction by referencing relevant case diary paragraphs showing prima facie involvement, and dismissed contentions that the order was mechanical or unreasoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-May-2026
Disposed
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
23-May-2026
Order
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
30-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
13-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 138/2025
CASE SUMMARY The Sessions Judge dismissed Kamlesh Kumar Ram's revision petition challenging the magistrate's cognizance order in a group assault case arising from a partition dispute. Although the investigating officer's chargesheet excluded the petitioner and charged only four others under IPC sections 341, 323, 337, 504, 506/34, the magistrate took cognizance against all FIR-named accused including the petitioner under additional sections 307, 379, 354. The court held the magistrate's reasoned order lawful, finding the lower court properly exercised jurisdiction by referencing relevant case diary paragraphs showing prima facie involvement, and dismissed contentions that the order was mechanical or unreasoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts