Ravindra Singh vs State of Bihar — 130/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd May 2026.

Case disposed

Cri. Rev App. - CRI. REVISION

CNR: BRBU100073002024

Filing Number

7287/2024

Filing Date

07-Oct-2024

Registration No

130/2024

Registration Date

07-Oct-2024

Court

DJ Div. Buxar

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

23-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ravindra Singh

    Adv. Rajesh Ranjan Sahay

  2. 2.Raj Nath Singh

  3. 3.Mutari Devi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

  2. 2.Sandesh Kumar Singh

  3. 3.Kamal Prasad Singh

  4. 4.Kashmiri Devi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-May-2026

    Copy of order

    The Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Ravindra Singh, Raj Nath Singh, and Mutari Devi against an SDM order requiring them to furnish bonds for maintaining peace in a land dispute. The court held that the SDM's show-cause order was merely interlocutory in nature—procedurally giving notice of allegations without finally deciding parties' rights—and therefore the revision petition was not maintainable under Section 438(2) of B.N.S.S. The parties were directed to file their objections in replies to the show-cause notice instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  4. 22-May-2026

    Order

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  5. 07-May-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  6. 18-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  11. 16-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  12. 19-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  13. 15-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  14. 10-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  15. 01-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  16. 07-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  17. 09-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  18. 08-May-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  19. 05-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  20. 04-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  21. 29-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  22. 20-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  23. 20-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  24. 17-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 07-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 130/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Ravindra Singh, Raj Nath Singh, and Mutari Devi against an SDM order requiring them to furnish bonds for maintaining peace in a land dispute. The court held that the SDM's show-cause order was merely interlocutory in nature—procedurally giving notice of allegations without finally deciding parties' rights—and therefore the revision petition was not maintainable under Section 438(2) of B.N.S.S. The parties were directed to file their objections in replies to the show-cause notice instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case