Vikash Kumar vs State of Bihar — 115/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.
Cri. Rev App. - CRI. REVISION
CNR: BRBU100067662024
Filing Number
6765/2024
Filing Date
18-Sep-2024
Registration No
115/2024
Registration Date
18-Sep-2024
Court
DJ Div. Buxar
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 04-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vikash Kumar
Adv. Kamod Prasad Singh
-
2.Bablu Yadav
-
3.Krishna Yadav
-
4.Raman Yadav
-
5.Diwas Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
-
2.Vivek Kumar
-
3.Ganesh Singh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Summary The Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition, holding that the SDM's order requiring the parties to furnish bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 for maintaining peace was an interlocutory order, not a final order on the merits. Applying the Allahabad High Court's test, the court determined that since the order merely calls upon parties to show cause but does not finally dispose of their rights, it is procedural in nature and thus the revision petition is not maintainable under Section 438(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The parties were permitted to file objections in their replies to the show cause notice before the SDM. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Order
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
23-Aug-2025
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
16-Jul-2025
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
09-Jun-2025
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
30-Apr-2025
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
17-Mar-2025
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
24-Jan-2025
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
17-Dec-2024
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
14-Nov-2024
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
24-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 115/2024
Summary The Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition, holding that the SDM's order requiring the parties to furnish bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 for maintaining peace was an interlocutory order, not a final order on the merits. Applying the Allahabad High Court's test, the court determined that since the order merely calls upon parties to show cause but does not finally dispose of their rights, it is procedural in nature and thus the revision petition is not maintainable under Section 438(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The parties were permitted to file objections in their replies to the show cause notice before the SDM. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts