Prerna Pushpa vs State of Bihar — 105/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th March 2026.
Cri. Rev App. - CRI. REVISION
CNR: BRBU100067352025
Filing Number
5938/2025
Filing Date
15-Sep-2025
Registration No
105/2025
Registration Date
15-Sep-2025
Court
DJ Div. Buxar
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 04-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Prerna Pushpa
Adv. Rajeev Kumar Rai
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
-
2.Dinesh Kumar Gupta
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
The Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Prerna Pushpa, upholding the lower court's order directing her to pay interim compensation of Rs. 55,000 (20% of Rs. 2,75,000) under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that the lower court properly exercised its jurisdiction, considered relevant material, and no illegality existed in the reasoned order, as the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the N.I. Act favoring the cheque holder remained unrebutted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Order
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
03-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
20-Nov-2025
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
19-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 105/2025
The Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Prerna Pushpa, upholding the lower court's order directing her to pay interim compensation of Rs. 55,000 (20% of Rs. 2,75,000) under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found that the lower court properly exercised its jurisdiction, considered relevant material, and no illegality existed in the reasoned order, as the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the N.I. Act favoring the cheque holder remained unrebutted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts