Shriram Finance Limited vs Vijay Kumar Gupta — 28/2023

Case under Arbitration Act Section 36,2(e). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

EXECUITION CASES

CNR: BRBU100038332023

Filing Number

248/2023

Filing Date

26-Apr-2023

Registration No

28/2023

Registration Date

26-Apr-2023

Court

DJ Div. Buxar

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration Act Section 36,2(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shriram Finance Limited

    Adv. Raju Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vijay Kumar Gupta

  2. 2.Krishna Kumar Tiwari

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The Principal District Judge, Buxar, dismissed the suit (Suit No. 28/2023) filed by Shri Ram Finances against Vijay Kumar Gupta for default of the defendant. The court found that despite repeated summonses since 10.03.2026, the defendant failed to appear or present any authorized advocate, and was given final opportunity on 02.04.2026 and last notice on 10.04.2026. The suit was dismissed in default for non-prosecution as the defendant's continued absence was unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  8. 16-Jan-2026

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  9. 23-Dec-2025

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  10. 12-Dec-2025

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  11. 06-Dec-2025

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  12. 19-Nov-2025

    Appearence

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge VIII

  13. 07-Nov-2025

    Appearence

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge VIII

  14. 09-Oct-2025

    Appearence

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge VIII

  15. 11-Sep-2025

    Appearence

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge VIII

  16. 26-Aug-2025

    Appearence

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge VIII

  17. 01-Aug-2025

    Appearence

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge VIII

  18. 02-Jul-2025

    Appearence

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge XI

  19. 02-Jun-2025

    Appearence

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge XI

  20. 29-Apr-2025

    Appearence

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge XI

  21. 20-Mar-2025

    Appearence

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge XI

  22. 12-Feb-2025

    Appearence

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge XI

  23. 06-Jan-2025

    Appearence

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge XI

  24. 25-Nov-2024

    Appearence

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge XI

  25. 01-Oct-2024

    Appearence

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge XI

  26. 24-Aug-2024

    Appearence

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge XI

  27. 16-Jul-2024

    Appearence

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge XI

  28. 14-May-2024

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  29. 13-Mar-2024

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  30. 04-Jan-2024

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  31. 23-Nov-2023

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  32. 25-Sep-2023

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  33. 17-Aug-2023

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  34. 19-Jul-2023

    Appearence

    District and Sessions Judge

  35. 06-Jun-2023

    Appearence

    District and Sessions Judge

  36. 03-May-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 26-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District Judge, Buxar, dismissed the suit (Suit No. 28/2023) filed by Shri Ram Finances against Vijay Kumar Gupta for default of the defendant. The court found that despite repeated summonses since 10.03.2026, the defendant failed to appear or present any authorized advocate, and was given final opportunity on 02.04.2026 and last notice on 10.04.2026. The suit was dismissed in default for non-prosecution as the defendant's continued absence was unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case