Daya Shankar Dubey vs State of Bihar — 292/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,467,468,120(B). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBU100017632026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

1547/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

292/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Buxar

Judge

4-Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge II

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

29

Police Station

KRISHNA BRAHM

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,467,468,120(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Daya Shankar Dubey

    Adv. Devendra Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of accused Daya Shankar Dubey, a secondary teacher in Baksar district, who was accused of using a forged B.Ed certificate (verified as fake by Bundelkhand University) to fraudulently obtain an illegal teaching appointment under IPC sections 420, 467, and 468. The court found sufficient evidence in witness statements supporting the charges and noted that Section 467 IPC carries imprisonment up to life, warranting denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge II

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge II

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 292/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the anticipatory bail application of accused Daya Shankar Dubey, a secondary teacher in Baksar district, who was accused of using a forged B.Ed certificate (verified as fake by Bundelkhand University) to fraudulently obtain an illegal teaching appointment under IPC sections 420, 467, and 468. The court found sufficient evidence in witness statements supporting the charges and noted that Section 467 IPC carries imprisonment up to life, warranting denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case