Dewendar Yadav vs State of Bihar — 110/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),109,125,281,303(2),351(2),352(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRBU100017622026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
1546/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
110/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Buxar
Judge
16-Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge VIII
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
38
Police Station
SIMARI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dewendar Yadav
Adv. Satya Prakash Singh
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 16-Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge VIII
Disposed
Awaiting for Case Diary
Awaiting for Case Diary
Awaiting for Case Diary
Awaiting for Case Diary
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-03-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary | |
| 24-03-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary | |
| 23-03-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary | |
| 17-03-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The District and Additional Sessions Court in Ashm, Baksar granted bail to accused Devendra Yadav in a case involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 125, 281, 303(2), 351(2), 352, and 3(5). The court found that while the complainant and his brother sustained injuries allegedly caused by the accused and co-accused during a mob attack on February 16, 2026, the accused had no prior criminal history, was in judicial custody since February 17, 2026, and had no specific charges directly attributable to him. The court imposed bail conditions of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, ordering the accused to cooperate with investigations and not tamper with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The District and Additional Sessions Court in Ashm, Baksar granted bail to accused Devendra Yadav in a case involving charges under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 125, 281, 303(2), 351(2), 352, and 3(5). The court found that while the complainant and his brother sustained injuries allegedly caused by the accused and co-accused during a mob attack on February 16, 2026, the accused had no prior criminal history, was in judicial custody since February 17, 2026, and had no specific charges directly attributable to him. The court imposed bail conditions of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, ordering the accused to cooperate with investigations and not tamper with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts