Kariya Rajbhar Aliase Mithilesh Rajbhar vs State of Bihar — 109/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 06th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRBU100016752026

Filing Number

1465/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

109/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Buxar

Judge

9-Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge V

Decision Date

06-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

258

Police Station

BUXAR MUFASSIL

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 392

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kariya Rajbhar Aliase Mithilesh Rajbhar

    Adv. Santosh Kumar Sinha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The court rejected the bail application of the accused Kariya Rajbhar in a case involving dacoity and robbery (IPC Section 392). The court found that the accused was involved in looting a motorcycle and other valuables along with co-accused based on credible evidence and prior criminal history, making him unsuitable for bail despite his arguments of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge V

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge V

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge V

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge V

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge V

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge V

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge V

  10. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 109/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application of the accused Kariya Rajbhar in a case involving dacoity and robbery (IPC Section 392). The court found that the accused was involved in looting a motorcycle and other valuables along with co-accused based on credible evidence and prior criminal history, making him unsuitable for bail despite his arguments of innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case