UmaShankar Mishra Aliase Bittu Mishra vs State of Bihar — 106/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),110,352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRBU100016212026
e-Filing Number
28-02-2026
Filing Number
1417/2026
Filing Date
28-02-2026
Registration No
106/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Buxar
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
12
Police Station
TILAKRAI KA HATA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UmaShankar Mishra Aliase Bittu Mishra
Adv. Sandeep Kumar
Shivshankar Mishra
Adv. Sandeep Kumar
Ashok Mishra
Adv. Sandeep Kumar
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Disposed
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Court, Buxar granted bail to three petitioners (Umashankar Mishra, Shiv Shankar Mishra, and Ashok Mishra) charged with assault and knife attack in a land payment dispute, finding that the parties had amicably settled the matter with the informant's support and the petitioners had no criminal record. The court imposed a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount, valid for four weeks, with the condition that bail could be cancelled if the petitioners' claimed clean antecedent was found incorrect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Sessions Court, Buxar granted bail to three petitioners (Umashankar Mishra, Shiv Shankar Mishra, and Ashok Mishra) charged with assault and knife attack in a land payment dispute, finding that the parties had amicably settled the matter with the informant's support and the petitioners had no criminal record. The court imposed a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount, valid for four weeks, with the condition that bail could be cancelled if the petitioners' claimed clean antecedent was found incorrect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts