Sunil Kumar vs State of Bihar — 272/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,307,379,504/34. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBU100015632026

e-Filing Number

27-02-2026

Filing Number

1362/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

272/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Buxar

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

139

Police Station

BUXAR MUFASSIL

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,307,379,504/34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sunil Kumar

    Adv. Shasi Shekar Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The court rejected Sunil Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving serious charges including criminal intimidation, assault, and attempted murder. The court cited the gravity of the offenses, the petitioner's non-cooperation with trial proceedings (evidenced by process issued under Section 82 Cr.P.C.), and the rejection of bail for similarly situated co-accused, directing him instead to surrender and seek regular bail before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 272/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Sunil Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving serious charges including criminal intimidation, assault, and attempted murder. The court cited the gravity of the offenses, the petitioner's non-cooperation with trial proceedings (evidenced by process issued under Section 82 Cr.P.C.), and the rejection of bail for similarly situated co-accused, directing him instead to surrender and seek regular bail before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case