Rinki Devi vs State of Bihar — 105/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,419,420,467,468,471. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 11th March 2026.

Regular Bail

CNR: BRBU100015602026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

27-02-2026

Filing Number

1360/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

105/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Buxar

Judge

3-Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge I

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

41

Police Station

BUXAR CYBER

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 406,419,420,467,468,471
I.T. Act 2000 Section 66(c)66(D)

Petitioner(s)

Rinki Devi

Adv. Akhil Kumar Prasad

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge I

11-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

HEARING

02-03-2026

HEARING

28-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of order

The Additional Sessions Judge, Buxar rejected the bail petition of Rinki Devi in a cyber fraud case involving charges under IPC sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and IT Act sections 66(C), 66(D). The court found the offense serious based on evidence showing the petitioner allegedly conspired with co-accused to defraud 34+ village women by fraudulently opening bank and SIM accounts using their Aadhaar cards, resulting in unauthorized transactions and frozen accounts. The court noted the High Court had already rejected her previous bail petition and found no fresh grounds to reconsider. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge, Buxar rejected the bail petition of Rinki Devi in a cyber fraud case involving charges under IPC sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and IT Act sections 66(C), 66(D). The court found the offense serious based on evidence showing the petitioner allegedly conspired with co-accused to defraud 34+ village women by fraudulently opening bank and SIM accounts using their Aadhaar cards, resulting in unauthorized transactions and frozen accounts. The court noted the High Court had already rejected her previous bail petition and found no fresh grounds to reconsider. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Buxar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case