Ravi ranjan vs State of Bihar — 258/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),117(2),74,109,351,352(2),324(4),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBU100015142026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
1322/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
258/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Buxar
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
91
Police Station
NAWA NAGAR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ravi ranjan
Adv. Suman Kumar Srivastva
-
2.Ashok Singh Alias Ashok Kumar
-
3.Ramuna Singh
-
4.Dharmendra Kumar Singh
-
5.Surendra Singh
-
6.Sudarshan Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
The Sessions Judge, Buxar granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners (Ravi Ranjaj Kumar, Ashok Singh, Ramuna Singh, Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Surendra Singh, and Sudarshan Singh) in a case involving alleged assault and criminal intimidation. The court found no specific allegations against the petitioners, noted that injuries sustained were simple in nature, and observed that co-accused persons had already been granted regular bail, making the bail conditions reasonable. Each petitioner was required to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 258/2026
The Sessions Judge, Buxar granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners (Ravi Ranjaj Kumar, Ashok Singh, Ramuna Singh, Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Surendra Singh, and Sudarshan Singh) in a case involving alleged assault and criminal intimidation. The court found no specific allegations against the petitioners, noted that injuries sustained were simple in nature, and observed that co-accused persons had already been granted regular bail, making the bail conditions reasonable. Each petitioner was required to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts