Raghunath Kharwar vs State of Bihar — 254/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,323,307,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 26th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBU100015112026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

1320/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

254/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Buxar

Judge

7-Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge III

Decision Date

26th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

367

Police Station

DUMRAON

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,323,307,504,506

Petitioner(s)

Raghunath Kharwar

Adv. Santosh Kumar Sinha

Prabhunath Kharwar

Adv. Santosh Kumar Sinha

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 7-Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge III

26-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

HEARING

27-02-2026

HEARING

26-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

26-03-2026
Copy of order

Case Summary The District and Additional Sessions Judge, Buxar, granted anticipatory bail to accused Raghunath Kharwar and Prabhunath Kharwar in a case involving serious charges of rioting, attempted murder, and criminal intimidation (IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 504, 506). The court found that the accused had no prior criminal history, the FIR was filed with significant delay without clear justification, and a counter-case had already been registered against the informant, suggesting the original complaint may be motivated by money rather than genuine grievance. The court approved their interim bail with a bond of ₹10,000 each and two sureties of equal amount, subject to their cooperation under CrPC Section 482(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The District and Additional Sessions Judge, Buxar, granted anticipatory bail to accused Raghunath Kharwar and Prabhunath Kharwar in a case involving serious charges of rioting, attempted murder, and criminal intimidation (IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 504, 506). The court found that the accused had no prior criminal history, the FIR was filed with significant delay without clear justification, and a counter-case had already been registered against the informant, suggesting the original complaint may be motivated by money rather than genuine grievance. The court approved their interim bail with a bond of ₹10,000 each and two sureties of equal amount, subject to their cooperation under CrPC Section 482(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Buxar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case