Anish kumar vs State of Bihar — 95/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(6),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRBU100015012026

e-Filing Number

24-02-2026

Filing Number

1314/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

95/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Buxar

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

85

Police Station

MURAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(6),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anish kumar

    Adv. Shasi Shekar Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Buxar rejected the bail petition of Anish Kumar (20 years old) filed in connection with a robbery case under BNS Section 309(6). The court found that while the petitioner's name surfaced only through a co-accused's confessional statement with no independent evidence against him, his three prior criminal antecedents and pending investigation warranted denying bail at this stage. The court granted liberty to renew the bail application after charge is framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 95/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Buxar rejected the bail petition of Anish Kumar (20 years old) filed in connection with a robbery case under BNS Section 309(6). The court found that while the petitioner's name surfaced only through a co-accused's confessional statement with no independent evidence against him, his three prior criminal antecedents and pending investigation warranted denying bail at this stage. The court granted liberty to renew the bail application after charge is framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case