HDB Financial Services Limited(Mr. Amitabh deepak) vs Dharamraj Singh — 4/2024

Case under Arbitration Act Section 36. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

EXECUITION CASES

CNR: BRBU100014072024

Filing Number

115/2024

Filing Date

12-Feb-2024

Registration No

4/2024

Registration Date

12-Feb-2024

Court

DJ Div. Buxar

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration Act Section 36
Code of Civil Procedure Section 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HDB Financial Services Limited(Mr. Amitabh deepak)

    Adv. Raju Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dharamraj Singh

  2. 2.Bindu Devi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The Principal District Judge, Buxar dismissed an Execution Petition (CIS No. 04/2024) filed by H.D.B Financial Services against Dharamraj Singh Baigarh for non-appearance, despite repeated notices and final opportunities granted on 02.04.2026 and 10.04.2026. The court found that the decree holder failed to appear for hearing from 10.03.2026 onwards and ruled that continuing the petition was unjustified, hence dismissing it in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  8. 16-Jan-2026

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  9. 23-Dec-2025

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  10. 12-Dec-2025

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  11. 05-Dec-2025

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  12. 01-Dec-2025

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  13. 29-Oct-2025

    Appearence

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge V

  14. 10-Sep-2025

    Appearence

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge V

  15. 04-Aug-2025

    Appearence

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge V

  16. 27-Jun-2025

    Appearence

    Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge V

  17. 22-May-2025

    Appearence

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  18. 05-May-2025

    Siristedar Report

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  19. 19-Apr-2025

    Siristedar Report

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  20. 24-Mar-2025

    Siristedar Report

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  21. 20-Feb-2025

    Siristedar Report

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  22. 17-Jan-2025

    Siristedar Report

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  23. 09-Dec-2024

    Siristedar Report

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  24. 13-Nov-2024

    Siristedar Report

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  25. 08-Oct-2024

    Siristedar Report

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  26. 05-Sep-2024

    Siristedar Report

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  27. 09-Aug-2024

    Siristedar Report

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  28. 16-Jul-2024

    Siristedar Report

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  29. 12-Jun-2024

    Siristedar Report

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  30. 17-May-2024

    Siristedar Report

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  31. 24-Apr-2024

    Siristedar Report

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  32. 16-Mar-2024

    Siristedar Report

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  33. 19-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 12-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District Judge, Buxar dismissed an Execution Petition (CIS No. 04/2024) filed by H.D.B Financial Services against Dharamraj Singh Baigarh for non-appearance, despite repeated notices and final opportunities granted on 02.04.2026 and 10.04.2026. The court found that the decree holder failed to appear for hearing from 10.03.2026 onwards and ruled that continuing the petition was unjustified, hence dismissing it in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case