Abhishek Kumar Rai Alias Molu vs State of Bihar — 4/2026
Case under Juvenile Justice Act Section 101. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
CRI. APPEAL
CNR: BRBU100010892026
e-Filing Number
10-02-2026
Filing Number
933/2026
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
4/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Buxar
Judge
3-Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge I
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
232
Police Station
BUXAR MUFASSIL
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Abhishek Kumar Rai Alias Molu
Adv. Shashank Kumar Rai
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The court allowed the criminal appeal and granted bail to a child in conflict with law (CICL "A") who was accused in a murder case. The court found that the child was not named in the original FIR and was implicated only based on a co-accused's confessional statement, with no overt act alleged against him. Applying the Juvenile Justice Act's principles of presumption of innocence and best interests of the child, the court determined there were no reasonable grounds to believe his release would endanger him or defeat justice, and ordered his release on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge I
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing On Addmission
Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge I
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing On Addmission
Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge I
-
18-Feb-2026
Hearing On Addmission
Dist. and Addl. Ses. Judge I
-
16-Feb-2026
Hearing On Addmission
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing On Addmission
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2026
Summary The court allowed the criminal appeal and granted bail to a child in conflict with law (CICL "A") who was accused in a murder case. The court found that the child was not named in the original FIR and was implicated only based on a co-accused's confessional statement, with no overt act alleged against him. Applying the Juvenile Justice Act's principles of presumption of innocence and best interests of the child, the court determined there were no reasonable grounds to believe his release would endanger him or defeat justice, and ordered his release on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts