Manoj Ram vs State of Bihar — 149/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,420. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBU100008122026

e-Filing Number

31-01-2026

Filing Number

693/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

149/2026

Registration Date

31-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Buxar

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

171

Police Station

RAJPUR

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379,420

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manoj Ram

    Adv. Ravindra Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    Court Summary The Sessions Court, Buxar rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Manoj Ram in a cheating case (IPC §379, 420) involving a fraudulent BSNL mobile tower scheme. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence linking the petitioner's mobile number to the fraud, despite his arguments that mere ownership doesn't establish liability. However, the court directed the Investigating Officer to comply with Section 41(A) CrPC before arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 149/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Sessions Court, Buxar rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Manoj Ram in a cheating case (IPC §379, 420) involving a fraudulent BSNL mobile tower scheme. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence linking the petitioner's mobile number to the fraud, despite his arguments that mere ownership doesn't establish liability. However, the court directed the Investigating Officer to comply with Section 41(A) CrPC before arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case