HARERAM SINGH vs RAMJEE SINGH — 30/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
Mislaneous
CNR: BRBJ220002382021
Filing Number
30/2021
Filing Date
24-Nov-2023
Registration No
30/2021
Registration Date
24-Nov-2023
Court
Piro Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub judge-I
Last updated 25-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARERAM SINGH
Adv. DAUJEE PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMJEE SINGH
Case History
-
30-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jun-2026
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
16-May-2026
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
18-Apr-2026
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
01-Apr-2026
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
21-Mar-2026
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
13-Jan-2026
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
24-Nov-2025
Appearence
Sub judge-I
-
18-Sep-2025
Appearence
Sub judge-I
-
19-Aug-2025
Appearence
Sub judge-I
-
14-Jul-2025
Appearence
Sub judge-I
-
09-Jun-2025
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Miscellaneous No. 30/2021 Outcome: The respondent Ramjee Singh's petition to reject the miscellaneous application was dismissed on grounds of non-maintainability and lack of merit. Key Points: Hareram Singh filed a miscellaneous case under Order IX Rule 13 seeking to set aside an ex-parte decree from 1968. Ramjee Singh challenged it under Order VII Rule 11, arguing defective parties and limitation bar (53+ years). The court held that Order VII Rule 11 provisions do not apply to miscellaneous cases under Order IX Rule 13, and limitation is a mixed question of law and facts to be decided at trial, not at the pleading stage. The case will proceed for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2025
Appearence
Sub judge-I
-
23-May-2025
Appearence
Sub judge-I
-
08-May-2025
Appearence
Sub judge-I
-
22-Apr-2025
Appearence
Sub judge-I
-
18-Mar-2025
Appearence
-
11-Feb-2025
Appearence
-
29-Jan-2025
Appearence
-
07-Jan-2025
Appearence
-
12-Dec-2024
Appearence
-
02-Dec-2024
Appearence
-
07-Oct-2024
Appearence
-
20-Sep-2024
Appearence
-
23-Aug-2024
Appearence
-
09-Aug-2024
Appearence
Sub judge-I
-
09-Jul-2024
Appearence
Sub judge-I
-
25-Jun-2024
Appearence
Sub judge-I
-
11-Jun-2024
Appearence
Sub judge-I
-
28-May-2024
Appearence
Sub judge-I
-
20-May-2024
Appearence
Sub judge-I
-
10-May-2024
Appearence
Sub judge-I
-
30-Apr-2024
Appearence
Sub judge-I
-
05-Apr-2024
Appearence
Sub judge-I
-
05-Mar-2024
Appearence
Sub judge-I
-
05-Feb-2024
Appearence
Sub judge-I
-
12-Jan-2024
Appearence
Sub judge-I
-
23-Dec-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Nov-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 30/2021
Case Summary: Miscellaneous No. 30/2021 Outcome: The respondent Ramjee Singh's petition to reject the miscellaneous application was dismissed on grounds of non-maintainability and lack of merit. Key Points: Hareram Singh filed a miscellaneous case under Order IX Rule 13 seeking to set aside an ex-parte decree from 1968. Ramjee Singh challenged it under Order VII Rule 11, arguing defective parties and limitation bar (53+ years). The court held that Order VII Rule 11 provisions do not apply to miscellaneous cases under Order IX Rule 13, and limitation is a mixed question of law and facts to be decided at trial, not at the pleading stage. The case will proceed for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts