DASAI MAHTO vs BDO CHARPOKHARI AND OTHERS — 202/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Appearence. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.

Title Suit

CNR: BRBJ220002192022

Appearence

Next Hearing

30th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

219/2022

Filing Date

25-08-2022

Registration No

202/2022

Registration Date

25-08-2022

Court

Piro Civil Division

Judge

1-Sub judge-I

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section 151

Petitioner(s)

DASAI MAHTO

Adv. SURESH PASWAN

Respondent(s)

BDO CHARPOKHARI AND OTHERS

DM

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Sub judge-I

10-03-2026

Appearence

10-02-2026

Appearence

09-12-2025

Appearence

23-09-2025

Appearence

15-09-2025

Appearence

Interim Orders

19-07-2025
Order

Case Summary Title Suit No. 202 of 2022 — Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I, Piro, Bhojpur The court rejected the defendant C.O. Charpokhari's maintainability challenge and found his unauthorized demolition of the disputed land's physical structure to be "whimsical, capricious, arbitrary and in violation of law," despite pending injunction proceedings. The court directed C.O. Charpokhari to file a personal show cause within ten days explaining why proceedings should not be initiated against him for recovery of Rs. 10 lac compensation and other legal action; failure to respond will result in the court proceeding against him. The case is adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Title Suit No. 202 of 2022 — Civil Judge (Sr. Div.)-I, Piro, Bhojpur The court rejected the defendant C.O. Charpokhari's maintainability challenge and found his unauthorized demolition of the disputed land's physical structure to be "whimsical, capricious, arbitrary and in violation of law," despite pending injunction proceedings. The court directed C.O. Charpokhari to file a personal show cause within ten days explaining why proceedings should not be initiated against him for recovery of Rs. 10 lac compensation and other legal action; failure to respond will result in the court proceeding against him. The case is adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Piro Civil Division All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case