luxman sah and others vs babita devi and others Advocate - arvind kumar verma — 22/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Title Suit

CNR: BRBJ220000602015

Filing Number

22/2015

Filing Date

07-May-2015

Registration No

22/2015

Registration Date

07-May-2015

Court

Piro Civil Division

Judge

2-Munsif

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.luxman sah and others

    Adv. birendra kumar singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.babita devi and others Advocate - arvind kumar verma

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Bhojpur dismissed the plaintiff's suit for being abandoned, as the plaintiff failed to appear for several hearings and showed no genuine interest in pursuing the case. The court found no objection from the plaintiff's counsel to the dismissal and directed the office to file the case records in the archive as per procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Munsif

  4. 13-Jan-2026

    Witness

    Munsif

  5. 01-Dec-2025

    Witness

    Munsif

  6. 11-Nov-2025

    Witness

    Munsif

  7. 26-Aug-2025

    Witness

    Munsif

  8. 17-Jul-2025

    Witness

    Munsif

  9. 29-May-2025

    Witness

    Munsif

  10. 30-Apr-2025

    Witness

    Munsif

  11. 04-Mar-2025

    Witness

    Munsif

  12. 24-Dec-2024

    Witness

    Munsif

  13. 10-Dec-2024

    Witness

    Munsif

  14. 01-Oct-2024

    Witness

    Munsif

  15. 09-Sep-2024

    Witness

    Munsif

  16. 19-Aug-2024

    Witness

    Munsif

  17. 20-May-2024

    Witness

    Munsif

  18. 09-Apr-2024

    Witness

    Munsif

  19. 27-Mar-2024

    Witness

    Munsif

  20. 22-Jan-2024

    Witness

    Munsif

  21. 11-Dec-2023

    Witness

    Munsif

  22. 09-Oct-2023

    Witness

    Munsif

  23. 14-Aug-2023

    Witness

    Munsif

  24. 07-Jun-2023

    Witness

    Munsif

  25. 24-May-2023

    Witness

    Munsif

  26. 13-Apr-2023

    Witness

    Munsif

  27. 23-Feb-2023

    Witness

    Munsif

  28. 05-Jan-2023

    Witness

    Munsif

  29. 24-Nov-2022

    Witness

    Munsif

  30. 20-Oct-2022

    Witness

    Munsif

  31. 07-Sep-2022

    Witness

    Munsif

  32. 29-Jul-2022

    Witness

    Munsif

  33. 20-Jun-2022

    Witness

    Munsif

  34. 22-Mar-2022

    Witness

    Munsif

  35. 18-Dec-2021

    Witness

    Munsif

  36. 29-Oct-2021

    Witness

    Munsif

  37. 20-Sep-2021

    Witness

    Munsif

  38. 30-Jul-2021

    Witness

    Munsif

  39. 01-Jun-2021

    Witness

    Munsif

  40. 23-Apr-2021

    Witness

    Munsif

  41. 19-Feb-2021

    Witness

    Munsif

  42. 07-Jan-2021

    Witness

    Munsif

  43. 04-Nov-2020

    Witness

    Munsif

  44. 03-Aug-2020

    Witness

    Munsif

  45. 15-Jun-2020

    Witness

    Munsif

  46. 23-Apr-2020

    Witness

    Munsif

  47. 05-Feb-2020

    Witness

    Munsif

  48. 16-Dec-2019

    Witness

    Munsif

  49. 23-Oct-2019

    Witness

    Munsif

  50. 20-Sep-2019

    Witness

    Munsif

  51. 02-Sep-2019

    Witness

    Munsif

  52. 01-Aug-2019

    Witness

    Munsif

  53. 27-Jun-2019

    Witness

    Munsif

  54. 24-May-2019

    Witness

    Munsif

  55. 04-May-2019

    Witness

    Munsif

  56. 26-Mar-2019

    Witness

    Munsif

  57. 23-Mar-2019

    Witness

    Munsif

  58. 02-Mar-2019

    Witness

    Munsif

  59. 06-Jan-2019

    Evidence

    Munsif

  60. 15-Nov-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  61. 07-May-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2015

casestatus.in Summary

The Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Bhojpur dismissed the plaintiff's suit for being abandoned, as the plaintiff failed to appear for several hearings and showed no genuine interest in pursuing the case. The court found no objection from the plaintiff's counsel to the dismissal and directed the office to file the case records in the archive as per procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case