NIRMALA DEVI vs JAGMOHAN PRASAD AND ORS. — 446/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Title Suit

CNR: BRBJ120005052025

Filing Number

505/2025

Filing Date

25-Nov-2025

Registration No

446/2025

Registration Date

25-Nov-2025

Court

Jagdishpur Civil Division

Judge

1-Sub Judge-I

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NIRMALA DEVI

    Adv. Ashok Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAGMOHAN PRASAD AND ORS.

  2. 2.BRAJMOHAN PRASAD

  3. 3.VIDYA DEVI

  4. 4.PUNAM DEVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Court of Sub-Judge I, Jagdishpur dismissed case T.S-446/2025 filed by Rakesh Kumar for lack of proper prosecution. The plaintiff failed to appear despite repeated summons since 06-02-2026 and did not deposit the required court fees, demonstrating no interest in pursuing the case. The case was accordingly dismissed and records directed to be filed in the office archive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Judge-I

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Stistedar Report

    Sub Judge-I

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Stistedar Report

    Sub Judge-I

  6. 15-Jan-2026

    Stistedar Report

    Sub Judge-I

  7. 23-Dec-2025

    Stistedar Report

    Sub Judge-I

  8. 03-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 25-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 446/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of Sub-Judge I, Jagdishpur dismissed case T.S-446/2025 filed by Rakesh Kumar for lack of proper prosecution. The plaintiff failed to appear despite repeated summons since 06-02-2026 and did not deposit the required court fees, demonstrating no interest in pursuing the case. The case was accordingly dismissed and records directed to be filed in the office archive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case