BANGUR PASI vs SHIVKUMAR PASI — 416/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th March 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRBJ120004812021
Filing Number
480/2021
Filing Date
09-Dec-2021
Registration No
416/2021
Registration Date
09-Dec-2021
Court
Jagdishpur Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub Judge-I
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BANGUR PASI
Adv. HARSHWARDHAN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHIVKUMAR PASI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order
The Sub-Judge Court at Jagdishpur, Bhojpur dismissed the case (T.S. 416/2021) on 10-03-2026 due to the plaintiff's lack of prosecution and absence from court proceedings since 09-04-2025. The court found that the plaintiff had shown no interest in advancing the case and had repeatedly failed to appear or be represented by counsel, warranting dismissal for want of proper prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Sub Judge-I
-
18-Dec-2025
W.S
Sub Judge-I
-
19-Sep-2025
W.S
Sub Judge-I
-
28-Jul-2025
W.S
Sub Judge-I
-
16-Jun-2025
W.S
Sub Judge-I
-
09-Apr-2025
W.S
Sub Judge-I
-
05-Feb-2025
W.S
Sub Judge-I
-
16-Jan-2025
W.S
Sub Judge-I
-
26-Nov-2024
W.S
Sub Judge-I
-
03-Sep-2024
W.S
Sub Judge-I
-
12-Jul-2024
W.S
Sub Judge-I
-
02-May-2024
W.S
Sub Judge-I
-
08-Feb-2024
W.S
Sub Judge-I
-
08-Dec-2023
W.S
Sub Judge-I
-
15-Sep-2023
W.S
Sub Judge-I
-
07-Jul-2023
W.S
Sub Judge-I
-
19-Apr-2023
W.S
Sub Judge-I
-
09-Feb-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge-I
-
24-Nov-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge-I
-
18-Aug-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge-I
-
28-Jun-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge-I
-
18-Apr-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge-I
-
28-Feb-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge-I
-
13-Jan-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge-I
-
10-Jan-2022
Stistedar Report
Sub Judge-I
-
21-Dec-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Dec-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 416/2021
The Sub-Judge Court at Jagdishpur, Bhojpur dismissed the case (T.S. 416/2021) on 10-03-2026 due to the plaintiff's lack of prosecution and absence from court proceedings since 09-04-2025. The court found that the plaintiff had shown no interest in advancing the case and had repeatedly failed to appear or be represented by counsel, warranting dismissal for want of proper prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts