Lalan Mahato vs Jitan Mahato Advocate - Vijay Ram — 529/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Appearence. Next hearing: 14th May 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRBJ120001572015
Filing Number
529/2015
Filing Date
24-Jun-2015
Registration No
529/2015
Registration Date
24-Jun-2015
Court
Jagdishpur Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub Judge-I
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Lalan Mahato
Adv. Binda Yadav
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jitan Mahato Advocate - Vijay Ram
Case History
-
14-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
Appearence
Sub Judge-I
-
02-Feb-2026
Appearence
Sub Judge-I
-
19-Dec-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge-I
-
17-Oct-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge-I
-
27-Aug-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge-I
-
20-Jun-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
30-May-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
16-May-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
02-May-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
07-Mar-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
04-Feb-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
06-Jan-2025
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
02-Dec-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
23-Sep-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
05-Aug-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
28-Jun-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
28-May-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
15-May-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
26-Apr-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
05-Apr-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
22-Jan-2024
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
14-Dec-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
21-Nov-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
10-Oct-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
04-Oct-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
12-Sep-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
04-Aug-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
03-Jul-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
08-Jun-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
17-Apr-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
24-Mar-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
20-Jan-2023
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
17-Nov-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
23-Sep-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
06-Sep-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
06-Aug-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
22-Jun-2022
Appearence
Sub Judge-II
-
22-Apr-2022
Restored
Sub Judge-II
-
03-Jan-2020
OrderView PDF
The court found the defendant's plea regarding the disputed boundary to be incomplete and lacking proper evidence. The court ordered that the boundary dispute case would proceed further, rejecting the defendant's contention that the matter had already been adjudicated, and directed the case to be decided on its merits based on proper documentary evidence and examination of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jan-2020
Disposed
Sub Judge-II
-
18-Dec-2019
Restored
Sub Judge-I
-
17-Dec-2019
Disposed
Sub Judge-I
-
26-Sep-2019
Hearing
Sub Judge-I
-
05-Jul-2019
Hearing
Sub Judge-I
-
06-May-2019
Hearing
Sub Judge-I
-
30-Apr-2019
Hearing
Sub Judge-I
-
18-Mar-2019
Hearing
Sub Judge-I
-
18-Jan-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jun-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 529/2015
The court found the defendant's plea regarding the disputed boundary to be incomplete and lacking proper evidence. The court ordered that the boundary dispute case would proceed further, rejecting the defendant's contention that the matter had already been adjudicated, and directed the case to be decided on its merits based on proper documentary evidence and examination of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts