Gopal Jee vs Niranjan Singh — 111/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Appearence. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRBJ120001272019
Next Hearing
19th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
127/2019
Filing Date
01-05-2019
Registration No
111/2019
Registration Date
01-05-2019
Court
Jagdishpur Civil Division
Judge
2-Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gopal Jee
Adv. Dharmesh Kumar Singh
Govindjee Singh
Baliram Singh
Om Prakasd Singh
Pradeep Kumar
Rima Kunwar
Respondent(s)
Niranjan Singh
Jitendra Singh
Birendra Singh
Surendra Singh
Devendra Singh
Satyendra Singh
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Munsif
Appearence
Appearence
Appearence
Appearence
Appearence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Appearence | |
| 06-01-2026 | Appearence | |
| 20-11-2025 | Appearence | |
| 18-09-2025 | Appearence | |
| 11-07-2025 | Appearence |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Hakiyat Vaad (Property Dispute) No. 111/2019, Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jagdishpur, Bhojpur, Bihar Date of Order: 18 October 2019 Outcome: The petition filed by Gopal Ji Varish (plaintiff) against six defendants is allowed. The court declared that the disputed land is the ancestral property of the plaintiff and he has legitimate rights and possession over it. The court ruled that any deed or document executed by the defendants claiming ownership is void and fraudulent. The plaintiff is granted full rights to recover possession if unlawfully dispossessed by defendants, and defendants are permanently restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's possession or rights over the disputed land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Hakiyat Vaad (Property Dispute) No. 111/2019, Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jagdishpur, Bhojpur, Bihar Date of Order: 18 October 2019 Outcome: The petition filed by Gopal Ji Varish (plaintiff) against six defendants is allowed. The court declared that the disputed land is the ancestral property of the plaintiff and he has legitimate rights and possession over it. The court ruled that any deed or document executed by the defendants claiming ownership is void and fraudulent. The plaintiff is granted full rights to recover possession if unlawfully dispossessed by defendants, and defendants are permanently restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's possession or rights over the disputed land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts