Gopal Jee vs Niranjan Singh — 111/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Appearence. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.

Title Suit

CNR: BRBJ120001272019

Appearence

Next Hearing

19th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

127/2019

Filing Date

01-05-2019

Registration No

111/2019

Registration Date

01-05-2019

Court

Jagdishpur Civil Division

Judge

2-Munsif

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section 151

Petitioner(s)

Gopal Jee

Adv. Dharmesh Kumar Singh

Govindjee Singh

Baliram Singh

Om Prakasd Singh

Pradeep Kumar

Rima Kunwar

Respondent(s)

Niranjan Singh

Jitendra Singh

Birendra Singh

Surendra Singh

Devendra Singh

Satyendra Singh

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Munsif

10-03-2026

Appearence

06-01-2026

Appearence

20-11-2025

Appearence

18-09-2025

Appearence

11-07-2025

Appearence

Interim Orders

18-10-2019
Judgment

Court Order Summary Case: Hakiyat Vaad (Property Dispute) No. 111/2019, Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jagdishpur, Bhojpur, Bihar Date of Order: 18 October 2019 Outcome: The petition filed by Gopal Ji Varish (plaintiff) against six defendants is allowed. The court declared that the disputed land is the ancestral property of the plaintiff and he has legitimate rights and possession over it. The court ruled that any deed or document executed by the defendants claiming ownership is void and fraudulent. The plaintiff is granted full rights to recover possession if unlawfully dispossessed by defendants, and defendants are permanently restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's possession or rights over the disputed land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: Hakiyat Vaad (Property Dispute) No. 111/2019, Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jagdishpur, Bhojpur, Bihar Date of Order: 18 October 2019 Outcome: The petition filed by Gopal Ji Varish (plaintiff) against six defendants is allowed. The court declared that the disputed land is the ancestral property of the plaintiff and he has legitimate rights and possession over it. The court ruled that any deed or document executed by the defendants claiming ownership is void and fraudulent. The plaintiff is granted full rights to recover possession if unlawfully dispossessed by defendants, and defendants are permanently restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's possession or rights over the disputed land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Jagdishpur Civil Division All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case